And this just goes to prove what might happen as regards the original order if there is not full disclosure
{
Chapman v Kawash [2014] EWHC 4481 (Fam) Application by W to appeal, out of time, a consent order making financial provision for her. She was appealing on the basis that since the order was made, the W solicitors had uncovered evidence that the H may own land in Jordan which he had not previously disclosed. Permission was granted despite the W having had an inkling before the consent order was made that the H may have owned this land.
unknownx500
More posts by Diana Copestake
Recent posts from Freeths - Individuals
